Tuesday, 1 January 2008

Virginia Woolf's Orlando: The Book as Critic

by Kelly Tetterton
A paper presented to The Fifth Annual Virginia Woolf Conference at Otterbein College, June 18, 1995

As well-seasoned critics and readers, we are often accustomed to reading a text against itself, and Virginia Woolf's Orlando invites us to do so quite explicitly. The text asks us to reconsider the very notions of literature and sexuality that it itself seems so invested in. So far so good. But we are not accustomed to looking at the critical relationship between the physical book and the text we read, and in our failure to do so, we risk acquiescence to the reading of that text as it's been handed to us. I want to focus on Woolf's Orlando for several reasons: it is itself a complicated text to read, open to many interpretations, and publishers have felt quite free to exploit those various interpretations visually on the covers of the book; and because Woolf herself is a well-known author whose critical acceptance has always been inflected by her gender, and that too has spilled over onto the book's covers. Orlando the book has been packaged in distinctive ways throughout this century, and that packaging has recapitulated certain attitudes towards the text that have been cemented into potential blockades against other readings.

But before we get into all of that, a reminder of how things change. We read Orlando now most often as a feminist work that explores the boundaries of gender and sexuality and the limits of women writers within literary history, or as a sharp critique on the possibilities of biography. But Orlando was often first read by its contemporary audience as a gossipy portrait of Vita Sackville-West; the reviewer at the Daily Mail entitled his buzz on Orlando, "A Fantastic Biography: Mrs. H. Nicholson and 'Orlando': 300 Years as Man and Woman." And if it was not taken as straight Bloomsbury dish, it was taken as the delightful joke that Woolf herself claimed it to be. It was a hugely successful joke -- not just critically, but financially as well, both in England and America.It was Orlando that enabled the Woolfs to purchase their first car, and it put them on stable financial footing for the rest of their lives.

It was simultaneously read as a serious work of literature. The reviews in 1928 range (as book reviews do today) from mere plot summaries to gushing, vapid praise to thoughtful consideration of the work. It is the latter category that I'm interested in, of course. The writer for the Saturday Review feels that Woolf doesn't pursue her goose chase far enough, and that "it is the tragedy of one of the rarest and most strenuous intellects now at work that she persists in approaching fiction through a theory of fiction" (474); the reviewer for the Manchester Guardian notes her use of modernist technique to comment on the genre of biography. Critics writing through the mid-forties continued to approach the novel from different angles: Joseph Warren Beach, for instance, noted that "the point of the book seems to be that there is more than one person in each body, that each individual has, at least potentially, many selves..." (491), and Deborah Newton focused on Woolf's concern with time.

This is not to suggest that Woolf's novel came into its own early in its publishing history -- far from it. There is really a dearth of discussion about Orlando from its initial publication (and the attendant book reviews) until about the mid-1950s when the conversation begins to get going again. But that said, that initial conversation essentially lays the primitive foundations for almost all critical discussion to come later.

Almost all. Where are the feminist interpretations? Well, they hadn't happened yet. In part, it's a deliberately anachronistic question- -the women's movement of the 60s and 70s hadn't happened, and neither had academic feminist criticism come into its own. And yet now it's almost impossible to escape such interpretations of the novel. Why is that? have we become so much more astute than readers of nearly 70 years ago?

Partly yes -- we are far more sensitive to issues of gender than those readers of long agobecause it's now part of our social consciousness; even those who might disagree with such a critical approach must now acknowledge the validity of the approach itself. And partly no -- we are simply reacting to what we're given to read. Take a look at the most recent paperback covers for Orlando -- one from Harcourt Brace Jovanovich and one from the Quality Paperback Book Club. Anyone casually glancing at these covers is likely to suspect that issues of gender and sexuality are involved in the text beneath the covers. The 1973 HBJ paperback gives us two almost identical figures, one male and one female, divided by a clock; the 1993 QBC book cover is more abstract, but there's a prominent pink triangle on its spine and back. If we are better readers today, it's because we have some help from the publishers.

Help -- and possible hindrance. If we are more attuned to the sexual issues in Orlando today because of the novel's packaging, we are also less immediately aware of other aspects of the novel for the very same reason. The glory in whimsy and fantasy is lost from these contemporary covers, but these very elements were the ones highlighted in previous incarnations. The 1946 Penguin paperback features a young boy in Renaissance dress writing beneath a tree while an airplane flies overhead; the 1960 Signet cover features a technicolor version of the ice skaters from the Great Frost. These covers present the text to the reader as wonderful escapist fantasy, at the very least de-emphasizing feminist interpretations of the novel.

This may seem like an amusing bit of publishing trivia, but I think it's far more than that. Paperbacks are the primary medium through which we read almost all our texts today -- especially "the classics" -- and while we seem to have become quite sophisticated about critiquing some of the flashier aspects of popular culture -- TV, movies, advertising- -we have yet to learn how to critique the texts of paperbacks with the same sort of sophistication. Paperback books grew up with television, after all; they only became commercially viable just prior to World War II, and college students didn't even begin to buy them for their courses until the late 1950s. Paperback books are every bit asmuch a part of contemporary popular culture as television and movies, and just as ideologically insidious -- if we aren't paying attention.

You can trace Woolf's and Orlando's changing reputations, for instance, by reading the print advertising on the back of the paperback covers of Orlando. The 1946 Penguin says this, in part: "No writer was ever born into a more felicitous environment. . . . Her father was Sir Leslie Stephen, editor of the Cornhill Magazine. She was related to half the scholarly families of England. . . . The great literary men of the day . . . were often in the house and made a pet of the little girl. She was too delicate to go to school . . . ." There is nothing about Orlando itself, and this biography/advertisement is more interested in defining Woolf through others rather than by her own achievements. The 1960 Signet focuses far more on the book at hand: ". . . Orlando's story is a wild farce, a humorous history, a gay romance filled with the delightful experiences of one of the most fascinating and fantastic characters to ever rule the realm of fiction"; we also get commentary from three critics who praise the book. But compare that blurb to the 1973 HBJ: ". . . Virginia Woolf has created a character liberated from the restraints of time and sex. . . . A brilliantly imagined pageant of English history, society, and literature, Orlando is also a witty, feminist reappraisal of the nature of the sexes." We've come a long way from the 1946 Penguin, both in the cover art and the cover text. Nor do the changes end there. The 1946 Penguin doesn't include any of Woolf's photographs; the 1960 includes them, but reduced in size and all clustered together in the center of the novel; not until 1973 are the photographs restored to their 1928 locations (at least for American readers). Thus readers between 1928 and 1973 were either not given any indication that accompanying photographs existed at all, or they were given the photographs in an incidental way.

Which leads me to my next point. Woolf herself tries to direct our reading of the text with visual cues -- the photographs -- in much the same way the publishers do with their various covers. And in a postmodernist aesthetic, one is not necessarily more or less valuable than the other; but bothsorts of direction have to be acknowledged critically before the reader can take control of the free play of interpretive multiplicities available.

My point here is that paperback covers both reflect and reinforce the critical attitudes of the day, both visually and textually, and yet we very rarely pay attention to what those covers are saying. As Jerome McGann has pointed out, "all imaginative work appears to us in specific material forms. Many people -- even many textual scholars -- don't realize the imaginative importance of those material forms" (Black Riders, 168). And further: "a textual history is a psychic history . . . because it is first a social history. This is not a metaphysical fact about literary works, but one which is functionally related to and determined by the purposes of literary works, on the one hand, and the programs which seek to study them on the other" (Critique, 62). Paperbacks are a powerful ideological force -- they can persuade a reader to focus on one particular reading of a novel as complex as Orlando before he or she ever turns to the first page -- and we need to reckon with that force as readers and teachers of readers if we are to free our critical faculties to as many readings as possible.

Source: http://www.tetterton.net/orlando/orlando95_talk.html

44 comments:

Stan said...

Thanks. Now I want to read Orlando too.

http://minotauromachia.wordpress.com

fast car said...

情色誘惑秘訣情色自拍部落格情色臺灣情色航海王情色色自拍情色電話情色露出文章情色頻道情色裸體情色西門町情色觀看情色討論情色討論版情色試看情色迷姦小說辣妹視訊秀辛辣聊天室辛辣聊天是做愛聊天側錄視訊寫真偷拍視訊妹偷拍視訊寫真偷窺視訊麻辣聊天室跟mm聊天辣妹交友視訊辣妹個人聊天室辣妹聊天辣妹視訊交友網g8貼圖如何有做愛高潮如何令女性有性慾如何令女性有高潮如何令女性高潮如何令陰部濕潤如何令男人有興奮如何令男人更興奮如何令男人持久如何令男人高潮如何令男人興奮如何令男朋友有激情如何令男性興奮影片如何令男性興奮如何有做愛技巧愛撫如何對天蠍男撒嬌

黑色星期五 said...

來幫忙你衝人氣~順便留言支持你 ..................................................

開心唷 said...

thx u very much, i learn a lot

怡如 said...

臺灣自拍貼圖網做愛自拍照免費線上自拍影片自拍短片國中自拍av99直播av99洪爺影城av99影片亞洲av99影片金瓶梅影片av99影片洪爺avdvd168影片av女優線上免費看av女優論壇av免費情色短片av免費電影av免费电影av亞洲成人區av直播台av直播式av看影片av動畫卡通av專賣店av情色網站排行榜av情色影片免費觀賞av情圖貼av援交妹av免費區AV免費看短片av色貼圖av女優館成人文學網a18禁女生遊戲區85cc成人片視訊美女

v佳馥虹玲 said...

It's great!!..................................................

上宜俊宇芳心 said...

唯有用熱情、用智慧去觀察事物,這事物才會把他的秘密,洩漏給我們......................................................

KarieS美航嘉雯 said...

睇完之後覺得有d頓悟..感謝分享.........................................

G702aynelleKress0 said...

Rome was not built in a day......................................................

PorshaCoghlan梁子珠 said...

非常感謝~3Q~....................................................

淑娟 said...

0401影音成人影片交流愛撫淫叫色情照片性愛圖片女生如何自慰激突成人論壇美女脫胸罩走光一夜正妹視訊情人性愛論壇85cc影城性伴侶85cc色情影片打手槍情色視訊聊天室色情a片色情色情圖片限制級照片色情電話520sex免費色情網情色性愛一夜情聊天網成人聊天網視訊成人台灣性網av一夜女情色av淫女免費視訊美女挑逗情色影音聊天作愛影片辣妹清涼秀美女做愛成人自拍貼圖成人資訊色論壇台灣色情成人網站色情視訊聊天露三點打砲情色性愛貼圖av成人網成人影片

致念 said...

唯有用熱情、用智慧去觀察事物,這事物才會把他的秘密,洩漏給我們......................................................

韋于倫成 said...

青春一逝不復返,事業一失難有成。........................................

佳慧 said...

喜歡看大家的文章,祝你順心~^^ ........................................

D415_evonN_Risinger0 said...

Gods mill grinds slow but sure...................................................

雲亨Ab9雲亨 said...

your english is incredible............................................................

茂俊雅俊憲珊 said...

一個人的價值,應該看他貢獻了什麼,而不是他取得了什麼..................................................

均琇均琇 said...

世間是非,要如水泥地般水過則乾。................................................................

萱祥 said...

真是太有道理了~~我支持你~~~.................................................................

陳隆 said...

Poverty tries friends..................................................................                           

鈺禎蕭 said...

死亡是悲哀的,但活得不快樂更悲哀。......................................................................

堅強堅強 said...

當一個人內心能容納兩樣相互衝突的東西,這個人便開始變得有價值了。............................................................

李志吉 said...

It takes all kinds to make a world.............................................................

云依恩HFH謝鄭JTR安 said...

blog不錯唷~我會常常來看的~加油~!! ..................................................................

于倫 said...

有用的才華若不用,便如同日晷儀放在陰暗之中............................................................

洪淑桓洪淑桓 said...

人生最可憐的是半途而廢,最可悲的是喪失信心,最遺憾的是浪費時間,最可怕的是沒有恆心。..................................................

國昆 said...

困難的不在於新概念,而在於逃避舊有的概念。............................................................

祐音祐音 said...

認識自己,是發現妳的真性格、掌握妳的命運、創照你前程的根源。............................................................

姿柯瑩柯dgdd憶曾g智曾 said...

很喜歡看看別人的生活故事,謝謝您的分享哦~~..................................................................

林彥以林彥以 said...

傻氣的人喜歡給心 雖然每次都被笑了卻得到了別人的心..................................................................

陳璇竹陳璇竹 said...

與人相處不妨多用眼睛說話,多用嘴巴思考. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

宜欣宜欣 said...

People throw stones only at trees with fruit on them.............................................................

陳柏毅 said...

一時的錯誤不算什麼,錯而不改才是一生中永遠且最大的錯誤..................................................

家唐銘 said...

永遠支持你呀!!HO!!HO!!HO!!HO!!~~..................................................................

凱許倫 said...

做好事,不需要給人知道,雖然只是一件微不足道的事,但我相信,這會帶給我快樂。..................................................

凱v胡倫 said...

老天爺賦予了強者的能力,就是要他比弱者多擔待..................................................

劉王育正劉王育正 said...

永遠不要躊躇伸出你的手。也永遠不要躊躇接受別人伸出的手。.................................................................

智柏林婉林亞 said...

上班好累哦,看看部落格轉換心情~~~先謝謝啦!!............................................................

翊翊翊翊張瑜翊翊翊 said...

Many a little makes a mickle..................................................................

恩宛玲如 said...

這不過是滑一跤,並不是死掉而爬不起來了。..................................................

至馬馬馬馬玄馬馬馬馬 said...

與人相處不妨多用眼睛說話,多用嘴巴思考. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

黃英吳思潔吳思潔邦 said...

有深道,要慢慢感受~~^^ 加油......................................................

千TatianaCallan惠 said...

認清問題就等於已經解決了一半的問題。..................................................

Teo T said...

Hi there!

I recently came across your blog and have enjoyed reading through it. You have loads of great resources on literature here- this is a great piece on Orlando, very educational. I realise you haven't updated in quite a while, but perhaps I could persuade you to give your blog a second life?

I was wondering if you would be interested in sharing your blog on Glipho? Glipho is a new social blogging network that aims to promote the writing of its users and help build their audiences. We are trying to establish a creative community at Glipho, and your blog is just what we are looking for.

As your blog is powered by Blogger, you can simply import all your old posts to Glipho without affecting your existing blog at all. You can use your Glipho account to connect to any other major social network accounts you may own, so you can spread your blog as far as possible. We also use our own social media accounts to promote your content.

If you're interested check out our website at http://glipho.com and have a look around. Please feel free to ask me any questions, and if you would like to receive an invite to set up an account.

Have a great day,

Teo



Glipho Limited
14 Suite 3 D
Docklands Business Centre
10-16 Tiller Road
London E14 8PX


(e): teo@glipho.com
(w): www.glipho.com